I
enjoyed Posner’s text and am not offended by his attitude or his judgment.
Posner brings up valid points about public intellectuals, his colleagues, the
media, and the responsibility they each have towards the public and public
discourse. Everyone involved in addressing the public whether they are public intellectuals or a mere public figure, ought to use valid
arguments and reason (as is used in analytic philosophy) when addressing and
informing the uninformed public. I had to laugh as I was reading The Space of Opinion. There is passage (on
page 24) where Walter Lippmann suggests that the media spends too much time
simplifying and condensing information when addressing the public. Lippmann
believed in individuals who could share with society, “a deeper understanding
of what was really important.” I think Posner’s argument is of the same
thinking with regard to public intellectuals, though. Lippmann
suggested that media “reinforced the simplistic stereotypes and emotional
prejudices of its audience.” This problem remains today, as pundits continue to
evoke similar tactics, I think, with the intention to push political agendas. Chaos on Bullshit Mountain, anyone? :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment